"mis" update review request

[Harald Tveit Alvestrand]

--On 13. april 2007 18:03 -0400 John Cowan <cowan at ccil.org> wrote:

> Harald Alvestrand scripsit:
>
>> Seems to me we missed one when we did not lump "mis" in with "und" and
>> "mul" as "useless for tagging, don't".
>
> Indeed.  However, a use for "und-Latn" and "und-IN" has now been found.

Reinforcing my deep disquiet with the whole idea of using the LANGUAGE tag 
to indicate SCRIPT.

             Harald