policy wrt politics (was RE: be-tarask language subtag registration form)

[Doug Ewell]

> From: C Eddie Whitehead <cewcathar at yahoo dot com> wrote:

> mostly it's just not got to be offensive to speakers of the community 
> to which it applies.
>
> (that might be the case if we also registered the standard 
> orthorgraphy for Belarussian--right now only the Latin is registered 
> it seems:

This isn't quite true.  Both "be-Cyrl" and "be-Latn" are equally valid. 
It happens that "be-Cyrl" is divided between two orthographic varieties, 
one or both of which may need to be distinguished from the other.

--
Doug Ewell  *  Fullerton, California, USA  *  RFC 4645  *  UTN #14
http://users.adelphia.net/~dewell/
http://www1.ietf.org/html.charters/ltru-charter.html
http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages