OT Vexatious Appeals was RE: Tempest in an Armenian teapot resolved

[Debbie Garside]

Hi Frank

Having had a quick scan read of both docs, I cannot see where it deals with
persistent abuse of appeals process - vexatious appeals.

I have written to Brian and I am sure he will enlighten me if this is
already incorporated in some way.  I will keep you and list informed.

Best regards

Debbie

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ietf-languages-bounces at alvestrand.no 
> [mailto:ietf-languages-bounces at alvestrand.no] On Behalf Of 
> Frank Ellermann
> Sent: 26 September 2006 19:35
> To: ietf-languages at alvestrand.no
> Subject: Re: Tempest in an Armenian teapot resolved
> 
> Debbie Garside wrote:
>  
> > my crystal ball tells me that there are a number of appeals in the 
> > offing
> 
> <http://www.ietf.org/IESG/APPEALS/?C=M&O=D>
> <http://www.iab.org/appeals/> - no crystal ball required.
> 
> > To this end I would suggest that those official bodies, who 
> will have 
> > to expend (far too much) time in dealing with such appeals, should 
> > perhaps look at the refining the RFC that defines the 
> appeals process 
> > and introduce similar sanctions as per those that are used within 
> > English Law for Vexatious litigation.
> 
> <http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-carpenter-ietf-disputes> is 
> an attempt to extract this stuff from RFC 2026.  Black magic, 
> RFC 2026 is holy script cast in stone.  Its chapter 6 does 
> what you propose, I think.  If you review it please send a 
> copy to the IETF list and/or Brian.
> 
> Frank
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf-languages mailing list
> Ietf-languages at alvestrand.no
> http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages
> 
> 
> 
> 
>