REQUEST for registration of variant subtag 'grabar'

[Debbie Garside]

Frank wrote:

> I'd support a decision "show rejection by 639, get variant".
> Or depending on how complex that is, and how long this takes 
> a decision "show that you seriously tried it" is also fine.

This seems very reasonable.

Best regards

Debbie

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ietf-languages-bounces at alvestrand.no 
> [mailto:ietf-languages-bounces at alvestrand.no] On Behalf Of 
> Frank Ellermann
> Sent: 26 September 2006 14:19
> To: ietf-languages at alvestrand.no
> Subject: Re: REQUEST for registration of variant subtag 'grabar'
> 
> Debbie Garside wrote:
> 
> > I hope other members of this list will also comment on this
> 
> I'd support a decision "show rejection by 639, get variant".
> Or depending on how complex that is, and how long this takes 
> a decision "show that you seriously tried it" is also fine.
> 
> Obviously "grabar" is a legit "entity" of some kind, the only 
> question is what kind of entity, ISO language, IANA language, 
> or IANA variant.  At least it's no candidate for an extension.
> 
> Frank
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf-languages mailing list
> Ietf-languages at alvestrand.no
> http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages
> 
> 
> 
> 
>