Guernsey Jersey and Isle of Man ISO 3166-1 Codes

Debbie Garside debbie at ictmarketing.co.uk
Fri Mar 31 19:48:37 CEST 2006


I'm sorry I don't know about these other codes. Perhaps they are already
annotated within ISO 3166?

With regard to GB, I would agree the registry is not necessarily the best
place to do this but better to do it there than to lose the information
altogether.

Best regards

Debbie Garside

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ietf-languages-bounces at alvestrand.no [mailto:ietf-languages-
> bounces at alvestrand.no] On Behalf Of Kent Karlsson
> Sent: 31 March 2006 18:43
> To: IETF Languages Discussion
> Subject: RE: Guernsey Jersey and Isle of Man ISO 3166-1 Codes
> 
> 
> If such an annotation is added, then what about AX which was split
> from FI? And what about HK, MO, and CN? Etc.
> 
> I don't think the language subtag registry is the place to keep
> track of such things.
> 
>   /kent k
> 
> > At 15:33 +0100 2006-03-31, Debbie Garside wrote:
> >>Michael Everson wrote:
> >>
> >>>Why?
> >>
> >>The justification is in the official request.
> >>
> >>"This is a request to add a comment to the existing GB region
> >>    subtag that cross-references GB to subtags for related regions
> >>    which were previously denoted by GB."
> >>
> >>I just think this would be useful. It certainly won't do any harm.
> >
> > I don't see any reason to do this kind of annotation.
> > --
> > Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com
> > _______________________________________________
> > Ietf-languages mailing list
> > Ietf-languages at alvestrand.no
> > http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages
> >
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf-languages mailing list
> Ietf-languages at alvestrand.no
> http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages



More information about the Ietf-languages mailing list