zh-min-nan, zh-xiang

[Peter Constable]

Oh, well. We can deprecate those two after 3066ter is done.

 

________________________________

From: Addison Phillips [mailto:addison at yahoo-inc.com] 
Sent: Monday, March 27, 2006 10:46 AM
To: Peter Constable; ietf-languages at iana.org; ltru at ietf.org
Subject: RE: zh-min-nan, zh-xiang

 

I never saw registration requests to that effect, so I would guess the answer is "no".

 

Addison

Addison Phillips
Internationalization Architect - Yahoo! Inc.

Internationalization is an architecture.
It is not a feature. 

________________________________

From: ietf-languages-bounces at alvestrand.no [mailto:ietf-languages-bounces at alvestrand.no] On Behalf Of Peter Constable
Sent: 2006?3?27? 10:40
To: ietf-languages at iana.org; ltru at ietf.org
Subject: zh-min-nan, zh-xiang

 

Before 3066bis was completed, we added some entries in the 3066 tag registry to bring consistency with our plan for extlang and 639-3. Specifically, we added zh-cmn to supersede zh-guoyu.

 

I thought that we had done something similar to deal with zh-min-nan and zh-xiang:

 

zh-min-nan superseded by zh-nan

zh-xiang superseded by zh-hsn

 

(Note: in 639-2/639-3, min is the ID for a Philippine language completely unrelated to Chinese.)

 

I don't see this reflected in the sub-tag registry, however. Did we not make those changes in the 3066 registry?

 

 

 

Thanks.

 

Peter Constable

GIFT | GPTS | MICROSOFT

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.alvestrand.no/pipermail/ietf-languages/attachments/20060327/81952714/attachment.html