Process Enhancement

[Mark Davis]

There is nothing in the rules that says that we can't have a beta page, 
and nothing that says that IANA can't double check what they produce 
against that page, even if they follow the rules to the letter.

Mark

Addison Phillips wrote:
> This is suggested for a future 3066ter. For the immediate future the process is exactly as described in 3066bis (submission of individual records by the LSR to IANA).
>
> Addison
>
> Addison Phillips
> Internationalization Architect - Yahoo! Inc.
>
> Internationalization is an architecture.
> It is not a feature. 
>   
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: ietf-languages-bounces at alvestrand.no [mailto:ietf-languages-
>> bounces at alvestrand.no] On Behalf Of Ned Freed
>> Sent: 2006年3月20日 16:10
>> To: Doug Ewell
>> Cc: ietf-languages at iana.org
>> Subject: Re: Process Enhancement
>>
>> While I have no problem with this proposal being implemented, I think
>> there
>> is basically no chance of it happening without incorporating it into the
>> LTRU registration document.
>>
>> IANA is very careful to follow the procedures spelled out in the various
>> specifications the IETF produces and has historically been quite reluctant
>> to
>> deviate from them in even minor ways. (And I have to say I see this as a
>> Very
>> Good Thing in general.) And this proposal restructures the process fairly
>> significantly.
>>
>> 				Ned
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ietf-languages mailing list
>> Ietf-languages at alvestrand.no
>> http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages
>>     
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf-languages mailing list
> Ietf-languages at alvestrand.no
> http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages
>
>
>