Apostrophes in non-ASCII names (was: A proposed solution for
Caoimhin O Donnaile
caoimhin at smo.uhi.ac.uk
Thu Jun 29 16:02:33 CEST 2006
> Yes, it will. U+2019 *is* the preferred character for the apostrophe
> used for contraction and posession. Let me quote the relevant sections
> Punctuation Apostrophe.
> U+2019 RIGHT SINGLE QUOTATION MARK is preferred where the character
> is to represent a punctuation mark, as for contractions: "We've been
> here before."
> The semantics of U+2019 are therefore context-dependent. For example, if
> surrounded by letters or digits on both sides, it behaves as an in-text
> punctuation character and does not separate words or lines.
I am quite shocked to learn this. Ciaran is not alone. It's not at
all what I would have expected from Unicode. But if that's the
way it is...
It looks as if I should avoid using single quotation marks to quote
text in the future, but rather stick to double quotation marks.
Or maybe go for the French « » :-)
More information about the Ietf-languages