language tag en-cutspell

Debbie Garside debbie at ictmarketing.co.uk
Thu Jun 22 21:02:05 CEST 2006


Michael wrote:

"Bah"

I believe the correct turn of phrase, en-GB of course, is "Bah, humbug!" 

Debbie ;-)

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ietf-languages-bounces at alvestrand.no 
> [mailto:ietf-languages-bounces at alvestrand.no] On Behalf Of 
> Michael Everson
> Sent: 22 June 2006 19:52
> To: Doug Ewell; ietf-languages at iana.org
> Subject: Re: language tag en-cutspell
> 
> At 11:33 -0700 2006-06-22, Doug Ewell wrote:
> 
> >>If en-cutspell
> >
> >variant subtag "cutspell"
> 
> What do you mean? It ends up as en-cutspell, doesn't it?
> 
> >>goes forward, I would also like to see a tag
> >
> >subtag
> >
> >>for Regularized English, that's all I'm saying.
> >
> >As John said, go ahead and propose one.  Nothing happens 
> with regard to 
> >these "discretionary" subtags without a proposal.
> 
> Bah.
> --
> Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com 
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf-languages mailing list
> Ietf-languages at alvestrand.no
> http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages




More information about the Ietf-languages mailing list