language tag en-cutspell
Debbie Garside
debbie at ictmarketing.co.uk
Thu Jun 22 21:02:05 CEST 2006
Michael wrote:
"Bah"
I believe the correct turn of phrase, en-GB of course, is "Bah, humbug!"
Debbie ;-)
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ietf-languages-bounces at alvestrand.no
> [mailto:ietf-languages-bounces at alvestrand.no] On Behalf Of
> Michael Everson
> Sent: 22 June 2006 19:52
> To: Doug Ewell; ietf-languages at iana.org
> Subject: Re: language tag en-cutspell
>
> At 11:33 -0700 2006-06-22, Doug Ewell wrote:
>
> >>If en-cutspell
> >
> >variant subtag "cutspell"
>
> What do you mean? It ends up as en-cutspell, doesn't it?
>
> >>goes forward, I would also like to see a tag
> >
> >subtag
> >
> >>for Regularized English, that's all I'm saying.
> >
> >As John said, go ahead and propose one. Nothing happens
> with regard to
> >these "discretionary" subtags without a proposal.
>
> Bah.
> --
> Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf-languages mailing list
> Ietf-languages at alvestrand.no
> http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages
More information about the Ietf-languages
mailing list