mark.davis at icu-project.org
Tue Feb 21 17:05:51 CET 2006
2) Backward compatibility matters.
What exactly do you mean? Nobody's talking about removing the current
grandfathered tags, or any subtags.
John Cowan wrote:
> Mark Davis scripsit:
>> I agree with Doug's comments. The use of "sgn-xxx" was never a
>> particularly way of tagging, since it implies that there is some level
>> of shared comprehension between "sgn-xxx" and "sgn-yyy". Much better
>> would be "xxx-signed", etc.
> 1) There is some degree of mutual intelligibility, as I noted. 2) Backward
> compatibility matters.
More information about the Ietf-languages