Language Tag Reviewer
MRC at CAC.Washington.EDU
Mon Feb 20 02:42:14 CET 2006
On Sun, 19 Feb 2006, Scott Hollenbeck wrote:
> Mark, I'm not averse to making a change to 3066bis before it pops out.
> Nothing is cast in concrete. To find out if that was necessary, though, I
> sent Michael some private messages to let him know about the changes in
> 3066bis and to ask him if he's willing to continue under those terms. Ted
> and I are trying to get this addressed in time for the next IESG telechat,
> so there is a time constraint. You saw the reply I received.
Thanks for all your efforts. I'm just pointing out that everybody's
nerves were severely frayed, and that before judging a statement as
intemperate it's necessary to understand what led to it.
Ned's comments are well-considered; and I hope that his recommendations
-- Mark --
Science does not emerge from voting, party politics, or public debate.
Si vis pacem, para bellum.
More information about the Ietf-languages