Language Tag Reviewer

[Mark Crispin]

Scott -

With all due respect, Michael has been repeatedly provoked; and the person 
behind the provocations hides behind the IESG's skirts.

That individual's abuse is the direct cause of Michael's not being 
available to comment/contribute to the LTRU decision-making process of the 
language tag reviewer.

I didn't participate in LTRU either.  The less that I heard from that 
individual, the happier I was.

It's akin to saying "we had a democratic election, it's too late to 
complain now" when "filibustering" was used to shut out that person from 
the decision-making process.

I believe that Michael's concerns should be considered and addressed.  If 
that means last-minute pushback or amendment of 3066bis, so be it.

-- Mark --

http://staff.washington.edu/mrc
Science does not emerge from voting, party politics, or public debate.
Si vis pacem, para bellum.