Language subtag modification request: frr Suppress-Script Latn
Tex Texin
tex at xencraft.com
Thu Feb 16 16:29:26 CET 2006
Doug, I wasn't question that the subtag be added.
But adding it and then modifying it, seems risky to me as a general rule.
It creates opportunities for the tag to be used and then have its meaning
subtly changed.
I was just offering a way to have the tag added without that risk, in the
context of the rules that we are following.
tex
Doug Ewell wrote:
>
> Tex Texin <tex at xencraft dot com> wrote:
>
> > guys,
> > How about the reviewer reject it with the comment that we should
> > consider the modification and just do it once with consensus...
>
> Because "consensus" has nothing to do with adding subtags that
> correspond to code elements in the core standards.
>
> Really, this is quite different from the individual-request case. The
> Reviewer has little or no say in whether a subtag like 'frr' should be
> added. Even if he questioned the scholarship or doubted that 'frr' was
> really a separate language from 'fy', he must still approve the subtag
> because of its existence in ISO 639.
>
> This goes for the list as well. It makes no difference whether we like
> this subtag, or build "consensus" around adding it.
>
> Are I off-base on this? Is everyone else reading Sections 3.3 and 3.5
> differently from the way I am?
>
> --
> Doug Ewell
> Fullerton, California, USA
> http://users.adelphia.net/~dewell/
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf-languages mailing list
> Ietf-languages at alvestrand.no
> http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages
--
-------------------------------------------------------------
Tex Texin cell: +1 781 789 1898 mailto:Tex at XenCraft.com
Xen Master http://www.i18nGuy.com
XenCraft http://www.XenCraft.com
Making e-Business Work Around the World
-------------------------------------------------------------
More information about the Ietf-languages
mailing list