[newsml-2] japanese scripts)
nobody at xyzzy.claranet.de
Fri Feb 10 22:44:50 CET 2006
Misha Wolf wrote:
> I suppose that if the IETF takes much longer to move
> RFC 3066 bis to RFC status,
It is already an approved RfC, it only hasn't got its
> we may have to lobby for the RFC 3066 registry to be
Why not just use the new registry ? All that's missing
in 3066bis is to determine a "TBD" in [RFCTBD] and a
few other procedural details.
> We're now stuck between one system which has closed
> and another which has not yet opened.
I'm aware of the "closed" part, but where did you find
"not yet opened" ? The idea was to close the old IANA
registry when the new is opened.
More information about the Ietf-languages