LANGUAGE SUBTAG MODIFICATION - GB
Debbie Garside
md at ictmarketing.co.uk
Wed Apr 19 13:27:37 CEST 2006
Michael wrote:
Debbie,
> could you forward me the request privately in the correct
> format (cc'ing Doug so he can double-check the format)
Tis done!
Debbie
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ietf-languages-bounces at alvestrand.no
> [mailto:ietf-languages-bounces at alvestrand.no] On Behalf Of
> Michael Everson
> Sent: 19 April 2006 09:14
> To: IETF Languages Discussion
> Subject: RE: LANGUAGE SUBTAG MODIFICATION - GB
>
> At 22:07 -0700 2006-04-18, Peter Constable wrote:
> >IMO when there are changes in a code table where the
> >addition/removal/redefinition of one ID impacts the
> interpretation and
> >usage of another, then it is appropriate to document the
> impact so that
> >users have guidance to make appropriate choices. We
> shouldn't journal
> >historical trivia, but changes that significantly impact usage IMO
> >should be documented.
>
> OK, I agree. This isn't a "language" issue anyway. Debbie,
> could you forward me the request privately in the correct
> format (cc'ing Doug so he can double-check the format) and
> I'll process it.
> --
> Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf-languages mailing list
> Ietf-languages at alvestrand.no
> http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages
>
More information about the Ietf-languages
mailing list