LANGUAGE SUBTAG MODIFICATION - GB

Debbie Garside md at ictmarketing.co.uk
Wed Apr 19 13:27:37 CEST 2006


 Michael wrote:

Debbie, 
> could you forward me the request privately in the correct 
> format (cc'ing Doug so he can double-check the format)

Tis done!

Debbie

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ietf-languages-bounces at alvestrand.no 
> [mailto:ietf-languages-bounces at alvestrand.no] On Behalf Of 
> Michael Everson
> Sent: 19 April 2006 09:14
> To: IETF Languages Discussion
> Subject: RE: LANGUAGE SUBTAG MODIFICATION - GB
> 
> At 22:07 -0700 2006-04-18, Peter Constable wrote:
> >IMO when there are changes in a code table where the 
> >addition/removal/redefinition of one ID impacts the 
> interpretation and 
> >usage of another, then it is appropriate to document the 
> impact so that 
> >users have guidance to make appropriate choices. We 
> shouldn't journal 
> >historical trivia, but changes that significantly impact usage IMO 
> >should be documented.
> 
> OK, I agree. This isn't a "language" issue anyway. Debbie, 
> could you forward me the request privately in the correct 
> format (cc'ing Doug so he can double-check the format) and 
> I'll process it.
> --
> Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com 
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf-languages mailing list
> Ietf-languages at alvestrand.no
> http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages
> 




More information about the Ietf-languages mailing list