Registration of el-Latn language tag

Mark Davis mark.davis at icu-project.org
Thu Sep 29 15:07:38 CEST 2005


QO will even be valid under 3066bis; it is a private use code defined in 
CLDR for usage there.

Frank Ellermann wrote:

>Mark Davis wrote:
>
>  
>
>>Under 3066bis it will be much clearer what is and
>>isn't valid.
>>    
>>
>
>Yes - actually the detail I was most interested in.
>
>  
>
>>(These were all valid 3166 codes at some point.)
>>    
>>
>
>For most I see or know it, but there are also a few
>codes in your list I've never before heard of.
>
>  
>
>>>>haw-CT: Hawaiian(Canton and Enderbury Islands),
>>>>        
>>>>
>
>That's an example, IIRC it's in the world facts book.
>
>  
>
>>>>haw-FX: Hawaiian(Metropolitan France),
>>>>        
>>>>
>
>Here I'd guess that it was never valid.
>
>  
>
>>>>haw-QO: Hawaiian(Outlying Oceania),
>>>>        
>>>>
>
>That's news for me (like PU, but PU is plausible as
>one of several UM predecessors).  For QO I've no clue
>what it could be today.
>                         Bye, Frank
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Ietf-languages mailing list
>Ietf-languages at alvestrand.no
>http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages
>
>
>
>  
>



More information about the Ietf-languages mailing list