More comments on draft-03
Harald Tveit Alvestrand
harald at alvestrand.no
Sun Jun 13 12:58:48 CEST 2004
--On 12. juni 2004 14:47 -0700 Doug Ewell <dewell at adelphia.net> wrote:
> 7. I disagree with Harald Tveit Alvestrand that the successor to RFC
> 3066 should be delayed until the ISO 639/RA JAC comes up with an exact
> definition of how it allocates codes in various parts. This is indeed
> Somebody Else's Problem, the JAC's. The need to update RFC 3066 to
> incorporate script codes and to fix other issues should not wait,
> possibly years, for the JAC to provide this detail into their mechanism.
so do I....
what I was saying was in reference to a hypothetical "3066ter" - ie the
NEXT round of language tags revision. I'm all in favour of not doing
anything about that until 639/RA JAC is finished with its work.
More information about the Ietf-languages