comments on the draft...

John Cowan cowan at
Tue Jun 8 06:34:49 CEST 2004

Peter Constable scripsit:

> Well, then, that suggests that the following are all equally valid and
> useful:
> de-1904
> de-1905
> de-1932
> de-1968

Only if 1905, 1932, and 1968 are registered by someone.  But if so, then
yes; just part of the colorless green ideas that sleep furiously in
RFC 3066bis.

John Cowan  jcowan at
"In the sciences, we are now uniquely privileged to sit side by side
with the giants on whose shoulders we stand."
        --Gerald Holton

More information about the Ietf-languages mailing list