comments on the draft...

[John Cowan]

Peter Constable scripsit:

> Well, then, that suggests that the following are all equally valid and
> useful:
> 
> de-1904
> de-1905
> de-1932
> de-1968

Only if 1905, 1932, and 1968 are registered by someone.  But if so, then
yes; just part of the colorless green ideas that sleep furiously in
RFC 3066bis.

-- 
John Cowan  jcowan at reutershealth.com  www.ccil.org/~cowan  www.reutershealth.com
"In the sciences, we are now uniquely privileged to sit side by side
with the giants on whose shoulders we stand."
        --Gerald Holton