en-GB-oxford LANGUAGE TAG REGISTRATION FORM
jcowan at reutershealth.com
Wed Jun 18 14:51:04 CEST 2003
Jon Hanna scripsit:
> en-Latn-oed seems the least kludgy as well.
I think all of en-0oed, en-0ed, and en-latn-oed are hideous compared to
en-gb-oed. In this usage, "oed" is a marker for a sub-orthography of
gb orthography, which is essentially what it is.
John Cowan <jcowan at reutershealth.com> http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
"One time I called in to the central system and started working on a big
thick 'sed' and 'awk' heavy duty data bashing script. One of the geologists
came by, looked over my shoulder and said 'Oh, that happens to me too.
Try hanging up and phoning in again.'" --Beverly Erlebacher
More information about the Ietf-languages