en-GB-oxford LANGUAGE TAG REGISTRATION FORM

[Karl Ove Hufthammer]

Mark Crispin <mrc at CAC.Washington.EDU> wrote in
news:Pine.NXT.4.56.0306150752340.11845 at Ikkoku-Kan.Panda.COM:

> Harald's suggestion of en-oed sounds good.

This would conflict with RFC 3066:

   - All 3-letter subtags are interpreted according to
     assignments found in ISO 639 part 2, "Codes for the
     representation of names of languages -- Part 2: Alpha-3
     code [ISO 639-2]", or assignments subsequently made by the
     ISO 639 part 2 maintenance agency or governing
     standardization bodies.

-- 
Karl Ove Hufthammer
http://blogg.huftis.org/