en-GB-oxford LANGUAGE TAG REGISTRATION FORM
Harald Tveit Alvestrand
harald at alvestrand.no
Sun Jun 15 13:29:44 CEST 2003
--On søndag, juni 15, 2003 11:02:34 +0100 William Overington
<WOverington at ngo.globalnet.co.uk> wrote:
> I think that en-INT-oed would be nice. I would like to mention that it
> would be helpful if the definition extended not only to the Oxford English
> Dictionary itself but also to works published by the Oxford University
> Press in relation to typography as well, such as Hart's guide for
> compositors and also the book on the setting of mathematics and any other
> similar books from the Oxford University Press.
if we don't want -GB-, there's no particular reason not to go with en-oed.
there is no formal requirement on second subtags that don't have 2 letters.
More information about the Ietf-languages