Harald Tveit Alvestrand harald at alvestrand.no
Sun Jun 15 13:29:44 CEST 2003

--On søndag, juni 15, 2003 11:02:34 +0100 William Overington 
<WOverington at ngo.globalnet.co.uk> wrote:

> I think that en-INT-oed would be nice.  I would like to mention that it
> would be helpful if the definition extended not only to the Oxford English
> Dictionary itself but also to works published by the Oxford University
> Press in relation to typography as well, such as Hart's guide for
> compositors and also the book on the setting of mathematics and any other
> similar books from the Oxford University Press.

if we don't want -GB-, there's no particular reason not to go with en-oed.

there is no formal requirement on second subtags that don't have 2 letters.


More information about the Ietf-languages mailing list