<html><head></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; "><br><div><div>On Mar 12, 2012, at 7:52 AM, Patrik Fältström wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite"><div style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; "><br><div><div>On 12 mar 2012, at 07:22, Kim Davies wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="border-collapse: separate; font-family: 'Lucida Sans Typewriter'; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: 2; text-align: -webkit-auto; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 0px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-decorations-in-effect: none; -webkit-text-size-adjust: auto; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; font-size: medium; ">The target is really registries</span></blockquote></div><br><div>Not registrars?</div></div></blockquote><br></div><div>I'm not aware of any registrars today that use IDN tables in their business logic. They could use them to filter out known-bad labels before they start an EPP transaction, and to generate variant sets for registries that do not do their own variant handling, so I agree they could be another potential user. </div><div><br></div><div>kim</div></body></html>