<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 12 (filtered medium)">
<style>
<!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Tahoma;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle17
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;}
@page Section1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.Section1
{page:Section1;}
-->
</style>
<!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
</head>
<body lang=EN-US link=blue vlink=purple>
<div class=Section1>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'>That is just a wrong vision on what is going on here. Nobody is
asking or needing any delays or alibis. Everybody is working hard (some
voluntarily) to make things work forward in a good and safe manner. Comments
like the below are just a waste of time.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'>Tina Dam<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'>Sr. Director, IDNs<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'>ICANN<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<div style='border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in'>
<p class=MsoNormal><b><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"'>From:</span></b><span
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"'>
idna-update-bounces@alvestrand.no [mailto:idna-update-bounces@alvestrand.no] <b>On
Behalf Of </b>jean-michel bernier de portzamparc<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Thursday, December 03, 2009 6:07 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> Elisabeth Blanconil<br>
<b>Cc:</b> IDNA update work<br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: Consensus Call on Latin Sharp S and Greek Final Sigma<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal style='margin-bottom:12.0pt'>Since Rod Beckstrom announced
the Internet has changed :<br>
<br>
- Elisabeth says ICANN wants to delay gTLDs, to delay IDNgTLDs, to keep them as
a pressure on ccTLDs for" Fast Track"<br>
- "MY TRACK" starts testing : "run interplus and IDNAPLUS by
yourself, free from ICANN, IETF and Google".<br>
- Lisa gives ICANN an alibi to delay IDNgTLDs in questionning and delaying
IDNA2008 : a test is needed. Hence with IDNccTLDs<br>
- Andrew Sullivan introduces the progressive transition speed DNS<br>
- Jefsey sends a mail saying that Michael Everson is perfectly right !!!<br>
- Vint Cerf starts "Google Track" <a
href="http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2009/12/introducing-google-public-dns.html">http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2009/12/introducing-google-public-dns.html</a>
<br>
- Elisabeth says she switched to Interplus concepts under BIND and she feel
free, free, free and fast out of anyone's control.<br>
<br>
Gee ! This is an hectic life!<br>
<br>
What's next ?<br>
<br>
Portzamparc<o:p></o:p></p>
<div>
<p class=MsoNormal>2009/12/3 Elisabeth Blanconil <<a
href="mailto:eblanconil@gmail.com">eblanconil@gmail.com</a>><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal style='margin-bottom:12.0pt'>hi! Folks,<br>
<br>
I roughly understand that all this is to keep this WG buzy for another year on
IDNA, in destroying every agreement we painfully found. The target is to give
some delays to ICANNN. So they can register new gTLDs but no IDNgTLD before
every ccTLD has signed a contract with ICANN. It sounds reasonable and I am
glad many participate. <br>
<br>
To obtain it; it was just enough to restart again the boring issues. This is
why I am surprised nobody thought to discuss TATWEEL yet. What is the technical
difference between TATWELL's disputed consensus case and the eszett and the
greek final sigma cases? Also what about French majuscules and other issues
that we have started the list. <br>
<br>
Best<br>
<span style='color:#888888'>Elisabeth Blanconil<br>
<br>
<br>
</span><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Idna-update mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Idna-update@alvestrand.no">Idna-update@alvestrand.no</a><br>
<a href="http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/idna-update" target="_blank">http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/idna-update</a><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
</body>
</html>