<div class="gmail_quote">Le 6 octobre 2009 13:25, JFC Morfin <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:jefsey@jefsey.com">jefsey@jefsey.com</a>></span> a écrit :<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class="im">At 11:14 06/10/2009, Martin J. Dürst wrote:<br>
<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
On 2009/10/06 14:25, Vint Cerf wrote:<br>
> i think adding text about relationship to tables is the minimum<br>
> requirement. removing reference to CS has been proposed and if no one<br>
> objects to that alternative it might be the least confusing choice.<br>
<br>
I object to the removal of CS, because specs other than IDNA might make<br>
use of BIDI. Please see my previous mail.<br></blockquote></div></blockquote><div> </div><div>+1<br>Removing them adds nothing to IDNA but may create an additional problem with idnaplus when we succeeded in miniminzing them quite to nil. What would be the interest?<br>
Marie-France Berny<br><br></div></div><br>