Dear IDNAbis WG members,<div><br></div><div>First, my apologies for having not noticed or raised this earlier.</div><div><br></div><div>In idnabis-defs-10 section 2.3.1 paragraph 5:</div><div><br></div><div><div> Labels within the class of R-LDH labels that are not prefixed with</div>
<div> "xn--" are also not valid IDNA-labels. To allow for future use of</div><div> mechanisms similar to IDNA, those labels MUST NOT be processed as</div><div> ordinary LDH-labels by IDNA-conforming programs and SHOULD NOT be</div>
<div> mixed with IDNA-labels in the same zone.</div><div><br></div><div>I may have missed it, but don't recall any discussions about restricting the processing of other tagged domains. Is this the right draft to prescribe restrictions on how non-XN-Labels are processed?</div>
<div>
<div><br></div><div>=wil</div></div></div>