Dear Chair,<br>I will not feed this troll. <br><br>I just want for the records to mention that all over the world, experts are indeed used to this sort of ME's kind language. On-lookers (specially press lurkers) should not take it, at the expense of its author and of the seriousness of this WG, as a disgraceful set of hurting and uncompetent ad-homina. Its author, in his field, is an authority as repected, and as disputed, as most of those who reviewed our statement. We actually consider his post as a gentle mark of professional interest and possible support. <br>
<br>Please do not castigate.<br><br>Rémy Renardin<br><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">2009/4/15 Michael Everson <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:everson@evertype.com">everson@evertype.com</a>></span><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class="im">On 15 Apr 2009, at 00:27, Xavier Legoff wrote:<br>
<br>
> 1. our multilinguistics background makes us confident that true<br>
> linguists would never accept exceptions that they could not control<br>
> through the application.<br>
<br>
</div>I am a "true linguist" and I have confidence in this project, its<br>
chair, and the consensus we have.<br>
<div class="im"><br>
> 2. the IETF has not the vocation nor the linguistic and<br>
> multilinguistic competencies to take on the sole responsibility to<br>
> change and document the orthography of billions of people.<br>
<br>
</div>It doesn't. This is nonsense.<br>
<div class="im"><br>
> * conformance with our Internet PLUS (parallelly layered user<br>
> systemic) architectural concept for the support of our own needs and<br>
> of the Internet evolution as introduced in an IUCG Draft that is<br>
> related to the IDNA2008 deployment.<br>
<br>
</div>I don't see any reason for us to conform to your architectural concept.<br>
<div class="im"><br>
> * this would make for the easier support of our work on a semantic<br>
> addressing system when the digital ecosystem convergence is meeting<br>
> the semantic emergence.<br>
<br>
</div>THIS SENTENCE DOES NOT MEAN ANYTHING.<br>
<br>
At this point I think that you are yet another of Morfin's sock<br>
puppets. His "unique" linguistic constructions include, regularly,<br>
meaningless phrases like "digital ecosystem convergence is meeting the<br>
semantic emergence". I am sure that this means just as little in<br>
French as it does in English.<br>
<div class="im"><br>
> - The TATWEEL case<br>
><br>
> The introduction of the call for consensus about the TATWEEL issue at<br>
> the protocol level was, therefore, not a surprise. It only confirmed<br>
> that the WG-IDNABIS considered itself legitimate in deciding on<br>
> content syntax, orthography, and semantics, and was not only obliged<br>
> to transparent content network transport.<br>
<br>
</div>It *is* legitimate.<br>
<div class="im"><br>
> This being said, we wholly resent having had our Chair removed without<br>
> any good reason, to having our serious concerns and loyal actions<br>
> qualified as "fruitless excursions".<br>
<br>
</div>He is a troll, in my view and my experience. Evidently I am not alone<br>
in holding this view.<br>
<div class="im"><br>
> Moreover, the WG is several months late on a matter that we billion<br>
> users consider as<br>
> extraordinarily urgent.<br>
<br>
</div>Please do not pretend to speak for a billion users.<br>
<font color="#888888"><br>
Michael Everson * <a href="http://www.evertype.com/" target="_blank">http://www.evertype.com/</a><br>
</font><div><div></div><div class="h5"><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Idna-update mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Idna-update@alvestrand.no">Idna-update@alvestrand.no</a><br>
<a href="http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/idna-update" target="_blank">http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/idna-update</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>