I agree, good solution.<br><br clear="all">Mark<br>
<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sun, Dec 7, 2008 at 11:10, Paul Hoffman <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:phoffman@imc.org">phoffman@imc.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
...<br>
<div class="Ih2E3d"><br>
>When<br>
>we get closer to that point, we can also have a discussion, not<br>
>about "IDNA2008"->"IDNA2009" but about whether the new version<br>
>should be "IDNA2", "IDNAng", or some such thing (or just<br>
>"IDNA"):<br>
<br>
</div>Thank you, good solution.<br>
<div><div></div><div class="Wj3C7c">_______________________________________________<br>
Idna-update mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Idna-update@alvestrand.no">Idna-update@alvestrand.no</a><br>
<a href="http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/idna-update" target="_blank">http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/idna-update</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>