<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;"><div style="word-wrap:break-word"><div style="margin-top:0px;margin-right:0px;margin-bottom:0px;margin-left:0px">
<font face="Helvetica" size="3" style="font:12.0px Helvetica">Consensus Call Tranche 2 (Document Groupings)</font></div><div style="margin-top:0px;margin-right:0px;margin-bottom:0px;margin-left:0px;min-height:14px"></div>
</div></blockquote><div>YES&nbsp;</div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;"><div style="word-wrap:break-word"><div style="margin-top:0px;margin-right:0px;margin-bottom:0px;margin-left:0px;min-height:14px">
<br></div><div style="margin-top:0px;margin-right:0px;margin-bottom:0px;margin-left:0px"><font face="Helvetica" size="3" style="font:12.0px Helvetica">COMMENTS:</font></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>The contextual rules should definitely be moved into Tables.</div>
<div><br></div><div>I could live either with Protocol, Bidi, and Tables as 3 documents or as one. At this point, however, it does not seem worth the effort to combine them.</div></div></div>