<div dir="ltr">No it doesn't cause a problem: deprecation does not remove characters -- it just discourages their use.<div><br clear="all">Mark
<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 9:26 PM, Patrik Fältström <<a href="mailto:patrik@frobbit.se">patrik@frobbit.se</a>> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
I see the following proposal from UTC.<br>
<br>
Question: Some of the codepoints that either are, or are suggested to<br>
be, deprecated are PVALID according to the tables document.<br>
<br>
Does that create any problems?<br>
<br>
Patrik<br>
<br>
Begin forwarded message:<br>
<br>
> From: Rick McGowan <<a href="mailto:rick@unicode.org">rick@unicode.org</a>><br>
> Date: on 16 jul 2008 23.24.07 GMT+02:00<br>
> To: <a href="mailto:unicode@unicode.org">unicode@unicode.org</a><br>
> Subject: Two New Public Review Issues: Replacement Characters and<br>
> Deprecated Characters<br>
><br>
> The Unicode Technical Committee has posted two new issues for public<br>
> review and comment. Details are on the following web page:<br>
><br>
> <a href="http://www.unicode.org/review/" target="_blank">http://www.unicode.org/review/</a><br>
><br>
> Review periods for the new items close on August 4, 2008.<br>
><br>
> Please see the above page for links to discussion and relevant<br>
> documents.<br>
> Briefly, the new issues are:<br>
><br>
><br>
> Public Review Issue #121, Recommended Practice for Replacement<br>
> Characters<br>
><br>
> The Unicode Technical Committee has been requested to specify what the<br>
> recommended practice is for replacement characters in converting ill-<br>
> formed<br>
> subsequences. See the review document for further explanation:<br>
> <a href="http://www.unicode.org/review/pr-121.html" target="_blank">http://www.unicode.org/review/pr-121.html</a><br>
><br>
><br>
> Public Review Issue #122, Proposal for Additional Deprecated<br>
> Characters<br>
><br>
> The Unicode Technical Committee is considering giving a number of<br>
> additional characters the Deprecated property. For more details, see<br>
> the<br>
> review document:<br>
> <a href="http://www.unicode.org/review/pr-122.html" target="_blank">http://www.unicode.org/review/pr-122.html</a><br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
> If you have comments for official UTC consideration, please post<br>
> them by<br>
> submitting your comments through our feedback & reporting page:<br>
><br>
> <a href="http://www.unicode.org/reporting.html" target="_blank">http://www.unicode.org/reporting.html</a><br>
><br>
> If you wish to discuss issues on the Unicode mail list, then please<br>
> use the following link to subscribe (if necessary). Please be aware<br>
> that discussion comments on the Unicode mail list are not<br>
> automatically<br>
> recorded as input to the UTC. You must use the reporting link above<br>
> to generate comments for UTC consideration.<br>
><br>
> <a href="http://www.unicode.org/consortium/distlist.html" target="_blank">http://www.unicode.org/consortium/distlist.html</a><br>
><br>
> Regards,<br>
> Rick McGowan<br>
> Unicode, Inc.<br>
><br>
><br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Idna-update mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Idna-update@alvestrand.no">Idna-update@alvestrand.no</a><br>
<a href="http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/idna-update" target="_blank">http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/idna-update</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br></div></div>