It *is* related to Noncharacters. Default_Ignorable_Code_Point is a derived property. The code points that are unassigned (gc=Cn) but that should be DISALLOWED are all and only the Noncharacters.<br><br>Mark<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 9:59 AM, Paul Hoffman <<a href="mailto:phoffman@imc.org" target="_blank">phoffman@imc.org</a>> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"><div>At 9:16 AM -0700 4/30/08, Mark Davis wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
The formal name is Noncharacter_Code_Point.<br>
</blockquote>
<br></div>
Wait, wait. This is changing the topic completely.<br>
<br>
The issue I brought up was that some characters that were both unassigned and have the property of Default_Ignorable_Code_Point. In that case, and that case only, the question is whether the spec should treat the character as unassigned (and give it a property of UNASSIGNED) or as Default_Ignorable_Code_Point (and give it a property of DISALLOWED.<br>
<br>
This has nothing to do with non-characters.<br>
</blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Mark