This is the key remaining issue -- see my other messages of today.<br><br>Note: I'll be in India next week, and won't be able to really respond until after I get back.<br><br>Mark<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Jan 15, 2008 5:42 AM, Patrik Fältström <
<a href="mailto:patrik@frobbit.se" target="_blank">patrik@frobbit.se</a>> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div><br>On 13 jan 2008, at 19.48, John C Klensin wrote:<br><br>>> The best alternative would be to simply have all the<br>>> non-historic scripts have the same status in<br>>> *draft-faltstrom-idnabis-tables-03.txt*
<<a href="http://www.ietf.org/i" target="_blank">http://www.ietf.org/i</a><br>>> nternet-drafts/draft-faltstrom-idnabis-tables-03.txt>, by<br>>> moving the non-historic scripts to the same status as Latin,
<br>>> Greek, and Cyrillic.<br>><br>> Only if one believes that the IDN implications of using all of<br>> those scripts, and the restrictions that need to be applied,<br>> are as well understood as they are for Latin, Greek, and
<br>> Cyrillic. Some of the language communities (and I mean<br>> "language" here and not "script") do not believe that.</div></blockquote><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div><br><br></div>Do we have any agreement on this issue? I am updating the -tables-
<br>document now, and want to know what the final say is.<br><br>I do so far not hear we can treat all scripts equal. That said, I also<br>see a request change for a codepoint in the Greek script on the<br>Unicore list, which for me say that Greek is not much more stable than
<br>other scripts (sure, it would move the codepoint from Greeek to<br>Inherited, which might be a nightmare by itself if we take that into<br>account...).<br><font color="#888888"><br> Patrik<br><br></font></blockquote>
</div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Mark