I don't think it is necessary. If mixtures of scripts are not displayed (eg the user-agent flags them as discussed before), then they are not a problem. If mixtures of scripts *are* allowed, then there are so many other problems (eg with Cyrillic) that these pale in comparison.
<br><br>Mark<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 12/18/06, <b class="gmail_sendername">Erik van der Poel</b> <<a href="mailto:erikv@google.com">erikv@google.com</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
The script Canadian Aboriginal Syllabics contains quite a few<br>symbol-like characters, in some sense similar to the math symbols that<br>we now propose to remove from IDNA. Should this script be<br>re-considered?<br><br>
Erik<br><br>On 12/18/06, Mark Davis <<a href="mailto:mark.davis@icu-project.org">mark.davis@icu-project.org</a>> wrote:<br>> But which other scripts<br>> did you have in mind omitting, and on what grounds?<br>
</blockquote></div><br>