Standardizing on IDNA 2003 in the URL Standard

[Gervase Markham]

On 23/08/13 14:15, Gervase Markham wrote:
> I would be greatly blessed if someone were to put together four lists,
> one for each deviation character, of registries which allow that
> character, their current approach to the compatibility risk (bundling,
> blocking, nothing etc.), and their opinion (if they have one) on whether
> or not IDNA2008 is the way to go.

And, while I'm wishing, a write-up of how the current major web browsers
handle the four deviation characters.

Gerv