[Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5892 (3312)
John C Klensin
klensin at jck.com
Thu Aug 9 16:52:19 CEST 2012
--On Thursday, August 09, 2012 10:32 -0400 Barry Leiba
<barryleiba at computer.org> wrote:
>>> For the rule to be evaluated to True for the label, it MUST
>>> be evaluated to True for every occurrence of Code point in
>>> the label.
>> I have got a suggestion to instead of the above have this
>> For the rule to be evaluated to True for the label, it
>> MUST be evaluated separately for every occurrence of
>> the Code point in the label; each of those
>> evaluations must result in TRUE.
> I like this change; I think it makes it clearer. I'll edit the
> erratum before I mark it Verified.
Barry, please note that I completely screwed up the case of
"true" and "must" in my suggestion. Please including getting it
right in your edit.
More information about the Idna-update