I-D Action:draft-faltstrom-5892bis-02.txt

Mark Davis ☕ mark at macchiato.com
Fri Feb 18 18:43:19 CET 2011


That would work fine for me, with a slight change to wording.

> Mark Davis also contributed to the document, but do not believe the
> description of the issues in this document is optimal.

=>

> Mark Davis also contributed to the document, but does not believe the
> solution for the issues discussed in this document is optimal.

- from phone
On Feb 18, 2011 4:38 AM, "Patrik Fältström" <patrik at frobbit.se> wrote:
>
> On 31 jan 2011, at 19.14, Mark Davis ☕ wrote:
>
>> 5. Acknowledgements
>>
>>
>> The main contributors are (in alphabetical order) Eric Brunner-
>> Williams, Vint Cerf, Tina Dam, Mark Davis, Matin Duerst, John
>> Klensin, Pete Resnick, Markus Scherer, Andrew Sullivan, Kenneth
>> Whistler and Nicholas Williams.
>>
>>
>> While I appreciate being as a contributor, I don't believe that the
described consensus is optimal. So it is probably best to remove my name.
>
> Sorry for this taken so long time, but I have been discussing this issue
with representatives of the IETF trust. It was a new "case" for them, and
the way the mechanisms work, the intention with the RFCs is to name everyone
that have contributed to the document. Regardless of whether they are part
of the rough, or non-rough part of the rough consensus.
>
> So, I have problems completely removing your name as you have added so
much information to the discussion, but, I am happy to clarify in this
section exactly what you write above.
>
> My suggestion is because of this to have this section instead of the above
be the following (with a correction of spelling of Martin's name):
>
> 5. Acknowledgements
>
>
> The main contributors are (in alphabetical order) Eric Brunner-
> Williams, Vint Cerf, Tina Dam, Martin Duerst, John
> Klensin, Pete Resnick, Markus Scherer, Andrew Sullivan, Kenneth
> Whistler and Nicholas Williams.
>
> Mark Davis also contributed to the document, but do not believe the
> description of the issues in this document is optimal.
>
>
> Is that ok with people? Specifically you Mark.
>
> Patrik
>
> _______________________________________________
> Idna-update mailing list
> Idna-update at alvestrand.no
> http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/idna-update
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.alvestrand.no/pipermail/idna-update/attachments/20110218/195eb5be/attachment.html>


More information about the Idna-update mailing list