mixing different direction labels within same domain
jefsey at jefsey.com
Thu Aug 11 03:18:29 CEST 2011
At 10:44 10/08/2011, Abdulrahman I. ALGhadir wrote:
>Thank you for letting me in this I'll try to gather most of pointed
>issues in IDNA and I'll try to send to you later hopefully!
>But have ever seen this proposed solution on improving the display of URI?
>This solution has been pended waiting for any feeds on it so that
>they can publish it, and I think this solution will solve most of
>confusing problems in the display, yet it'll give us defending
>points on removing some limitations in the IDNA (hopefully!).
Thank you for your annouced help. I am looking for your contribution
to add to our wiki consolidation.
At this stage I am just trying to compile the post IDNA2008 problems
people raise in various areas. And possibly the terminology which can
be adequate to describe/address them among network operations and use
oriented WGs and NGOs (ICANN, IETF, ITU, IUTF). This is for all these
people to come with a simple, consistent, stable way to address them
at protocol level and then be able to discuss with Unicode what they
may need from them. In focusing first on the roots of the problems in
his are, one may help others to identify a similar problem they were
not aware until now.
Thank you for quoting pri185: from it I am going to try to extract
the problems they raise; in the way it impacts us. However, I am not
familiar with Bidi. So I would prefer specialists to summarize the
difficulties they meet and Unicode discusses. So, ICANN and other
people might understand better, decide if they also are impacted and
how to handle a possible difficulty they would have identified this
way in their own bailiwick.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Idna-update