Unicode 5.2 -> 6.0
Markus Scherer
markus.icu at gmail.com
Thu Oct 14 19:17:17 CEST 2010
2010/10/13 Patrik Fältström <patrik at frobbit.se>
> My personal suggestion is that if noone can show that domain names are in
> fact registered or used with U+19DA according to IDNA2008, IETF should
> accept the incompatible changes, and stay completely aligned with Unicode
> 6.0.
>
Seems reasonable to me. These three characters are fairly recent Unicode
additions (Unicode 5.0/5.2), that is, they were not valid in IDNA2003 and
are thus unlikely in use in domain names.
http://unicode.org/cldr/utility/list-unicodeset.jsp?a=[\u0CF1\u0CF2\u19DA]&g=age
markus
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.alvestrand.no/pipermail/idna-update/attachments/20101014/f928df32/attachment.html>
More information about the Idna-update
mailing list