Unicode 5.2 -> 6.0

Markus Scherer markus.icu at gmail.com
Thu Oct 14 19:17:17 CEST 2010


2010/10/13 Patrik Fältström <patrik at frobbit.se>

> My personal suggestion is that if noone can show that domain names are in
> fact registered or used with U+19DA according to IDNA2008, IETF should
> accept the incompatible changes, and stay completely aligned with Unicode
> 6.0.
>

Seems reasonable to me. These three characters are fairly recent Unicode
additions (Unicode 5.0/5.2), that is, they were not valid in IDNA2003 and
are thus unlikely in use in domain names.

http://unicode.org/cldr/utility/list-unicodeset.jsp?a=[\u0CF1\u0CF2\u19DA]&g=age

markus
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.alvestrand.no/pipermail/idna-update/attachments/20101014/f928df32/attachment.html>


More information about the Idna-update mailing list