IDNA 2008 Question Re: "Confusable" Characters in Domain Names

[Mark Davis ☕]

> One thing to add to this, which is that registries and
registrars were strongly advised, from the beginning, to not
register names containing characters other than letters, digits,
and the hyphen (with the first two groups expanded to cover
non-ASCII characters).

Where were these recommendations made?

Were these recommendations in a location where most people responsible for
registries and registrars (including non TLDs, like blogspot.com) were very
likely to see it? I don't see them in http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3491 or
in http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3454. UTR36 (
http://unicode.org/reports/tr36/) does make such recommendations, but
because the RFCs don't point to it, you can't expect all or even a majority
of such people to have read it. Am I missing other prominent locations where
such recommendations were made?

Mark

*— Il meglio è l’inimico del bene —*


On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 15:35, John C Klensin <klensin at jck.com> wrote:

>
>
> --On Friday, 05 November, 2010 17:26 -0400 Andrew Sullivan
> <ajs at shinkuro.com> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 02:17:01PM +0000, john daw wrote:
> >
> >> i'm not involved in the architecture of the Internet inany
> >> way, as my original email might suggest. €.com, however,
> >> ought to be "supported"as an existing domain name that is
> >> currently in operation.
> >
> > Why "ought" it to be?  Under the standard domain name
> > registration rules, "$.com" is not supported.
> >
> > You need to understand that the DNS evolved in an environment
> > where there were existing names for hosts on the network.
> > Those names were governed by the hostname rules, and those
> > hostname rules were pretty restrictive.  So the DNS standard
> > says, "If you want things to work well, you should use those
> > hostname rules."  Those rules are the so-called LDH rules.
> > And "$.com" doesn't meet the test.
> >...
>
> One thing to add to this, which is that registries and
> registrars were strongly advised, from the beginning, to not
> register names containing characters other than letters, digits,
> and the hyphen (with the first two groups expanded to cover
> non-ASCII characters).  The reasons were essentially the ones
> Andrew outlines.  If some of them permitted such registrations
> anyway, and didn't pass the warning along, then it seems to me
> that, if you have any complaints at all, they are with your
> registrar or registry, not with the IETF.
>
>     john
>
> _______________________________________________
> Idna-update mailing list
> Idna-update at alvestrand.no
> http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/idna-update
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.alvestrand.no/pipermail/idna-update/attachments/20101105/fce285fc/attachment.html>