IDNABIS Working Group completes its work

[Paul Hoffman]

At 3:13 PM -0400 3/19/10, Dean Anderson wrote:
>It seems rather premature to wind down IDNABIS when the work product
>has, well, stumped the DNSEXT Chairs---who seeking help on IETF main
>list because they can't figure out how to proceed---and is subject to a
>145 page appeal.

According the the appeal itself, the -mappings document is not part of the appeal.

>The work on IDNA isn't done. 

Anyone with credibility in the field can propose that the IETF do more work, either as individual submissions or as a new WG with a charter.