Mapping Poll - REQUEST
yaojk at cnnic.cn
Tue Feb 9 04:17:59 CET 2010
for clear, I support the current document. (choice 1)
----- Original Message -----
From: "YAO Jiankang" <yaojk at cnnic.cn>
To: "Vint Cerf" <vint at google.com>; <idna-update at alvestrand.no>
Sent: Tuesday, February 09, 2010 9:07 AM
Subject: Re: Mapping Poll - REQUEST
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Vint Cerf" <vint at google.com>
> To: <idna-update at alvestrand.no>
> Sent: Monday, February 08, 2010 4:56 PM
> Subject: Mapping Poll - REQUEST
>> Please read and respond to the recent long message that ultimately
>> asked for WG recommendations for moving forward on mapping.
>> The Area Director is of the opinion that we do not have rough
>> consensus on a way forward, so expressing your position is essential.
>> The options are tersely listed below:
>> 1. Would the WG like to adopt the current "mapping document" as-is?
>> 2. Would the WG like to engage in further discussion about this
>> document, for example in the context of the Unicode TR46 that
>> advocates substantially more mapping than the present "mappings"
> language issues are too complex, we might never get a consensus.
> We can not enumerate all the issues.
> when this issuse is resolved, another will emerge.
> The general framework may be necessary.
> Yao Jiankang
> Idna-update mailing list
> Idna-update at alvestrand.no
More information about the Idna-update