Mapping Poll - REQUEST

[Vint Cerf]

Please read and respond to the recent long message that ultimately  
asked for WG recommendations for moving forward on mapping.

The Area Director is of the opinion that we do not have rough  
consensus on a way forward, so expressing your position is essential.

The options are tersely listed below:

1. Would the WG like to adopt the current "mapping document" as-is?

2. Would the WG like to engage in further discussion about this
document, for example in the context of the Unicode TR46 that
advocates substantially more mapping than the present "mappings"
document?

3. Would the WG propose an alternative path towards dealing with the
question of mapping and if so, what proposition(s) are offered by the
WG members?