Comments on draft-ietf-idnabis-defs-10
"Martin J. Dürst"
duerst at it.aoyama.ac.jp
Wed Sep 2 05:03:37 CEST 2009
On 2009/08/31 6:37, Paul Hoffman wrote:
> Wil is correct, and this is clearly called out in RFC 3492:
> Punycode can also support an additional feature that is not used by
> the ToASCII and ToUnicode operations of [IDNA]. When extended
> strings are case-folded prior to encoding, the basic string can use
> mixed case to tell how to convert the folded string into a mixed-case
> string. See appendix A "Mixed-case annotation".
> We hated it at the time, but Adam insisted on leaving it in.
> If we want the output of Punycode to be all lower-case, we have to covert it after the conversion ourselves.
Couldn't we just say "use punycode, but without Appendix A"? It seems
that that's what implementations are doing, anyway. I don't think this
is able to deal with simple US-ASCII characters, but it will deal with
potential upper-case letters in punycode that represent non-ASCII
#-# Martin J. Dürst, Professor, Aoyama Gakuin University
#-# http://www.sw.it.aoyama.ac.jp mailto:duerst at it.aoyama.ac.jp
More information about the Idna-update