RTL labels and numbers?

Andrew Sullivan ajs at shinkuro.com
Wed Oct 14 18:18:46 CEST 2009


On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 09:00:12AM -0700, Erik van der Poel wrote:
> There may be different kinds of "inter-label tests", but the current
> draft does contain the following:
> 
>    An RTL label is a label that contains at least one character of type
>    R, AL or AN.
> 
>    A "BIDI domain name" is a domain name that contains at least one RTL
>    label.  (Note: This definition includes domain names containing only
>    dots and right-to-left characters.  Providing a separate category of
>    "RTL domain names" would not make this specification simpler, so has
>    not been done.)
> 
>    The following rule, consisting of six conditions, applies to labels
>    in BIDI domain names.
> 
> In other words, the implementation is looking at an entire domain
> name, potentially consisting of multiple labels. 

I was always a little unhappy about that text, but if you read it
carefully you'll note that there is no need whatever to look at more
than one label.  Moreover, there's no _inter_-label test.  

During WGLC I pointed out that the definition was such that an domain
name only RTL labels qualified as a bidi name.  The response was that
this is ok.

The upshot of this is that you can look at each label on its own.  If
you have a single label that contains any character of type R, AL, or
AN, you're in bidi land and you run the tests on every label. 

More importantly, the rule applies to each label on its own.  It is
not an inter-label test in the sense that it tests anything about the
labels in respect of one another.  The "BIDI domain name" moniker
merely gathers together all the relevant labels each of which has to
pass a set of tests.  But the labels are tested in isolation.  

Labels that consider the effects of other labels are what I would call
inter-label tests.  We might call the case you're pointing out
"multi-label tests" in order to note that the same test has to run on
every label.  But any tests that are designed to undo the restrictions
on numerals would necessarily need to take into account the effects of
those numerals on other labels, and that's when I have a problem.

A

-- 
Andrew Sullivan
ajs at shinkuro.com
Shinkuro, Inc.


More information about the Idna-update mailing list