[Gen-art] LC review: draft-ietf-idnabis-bidi-06.txt
eblanconil at gmail.com
Tue Oct 6 17:54:24 CEST 2009
Since we are to raise our finger and say "me too", I certainly support
Martin here. JM Portzamparc gave good reasons, also Tatweel made a
hell of a noise already.
2009/10/6 "Martin J. Dürst" <duerst at it.aoyama.ac.jp>:
> On 2009/10/06 14:25, Vint Cerf wrote:
>> i think adding text about relationship to tables is the minimum
>> requirement. removing reference to CS has been proposed and if no one
>> objects to that alternative it might be the least confusing choice.
> I object to the removal of CS, because specs other than IDNA might make
> use of BIDI. Please see my previous mail.
> Regards, Martin.
More information about the Idna-update