secdir review of draft-ietf-idnabis-rationale-13.txt

[John C Klensin]

--On Tuesday, October 06, 2009 07:12 -0400 Vint Cerf
<vint at google.com> wrote:

> if we mention DNSSEC at all (and perhaps it is not necessary
> since DNSSEC operates at the DNS level), we might simply say
> that IDNA is compatible with DNSSEC since signed DNS entries
> that reference IDNA A-labels are fully compatible with DNSSEC.
> It is a sort of gratuitous statement but perhaps it was
> requested because DNSSEC was "new" and the person requesting
> the reference wanted to be clear that IDNA didn't invalid the
> use of DNSSEC?

Or, if my memory is correct, the IDNA didn't require any special
handling in DNSSEC.

   john