Last Call: draft-ietf-idnabis-protocol (Internationalized Domain Names in Applications (IDNA): Protocol) to Draft Standard

[Lisa Dusseault]

This was entirely pilot error on my part.  I believe I have fixed it
now.  My apologies!

Lisa

On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 6:50 AM, Vint Cerf <vint at google.com> wrote:
> John,
>
> thanks.
>
> Lisa,
>
> the immediate reactions seem to be completely in favor of Proposed.
>
> Would you convey this to the IESG?
>
> thanks
>
> vint
>
>
> On Oct 1, 2009, at 9:48 AM, John C Klensin wrote:
>
>> Vint,
>>
>> While the announcement doesn't specify (and may need formal
>> clarification, but that is up to Lisa), the usual criteria for
>> moving from Proposed-> Draft is that the documents be
>> sufficiently similar that an implementation of the first can be
>> considered an implementation of the new version so that
>> implementation reports are meaningful (it is stated quite
>> differently, but that is what it amounts to).  Due to changes
>> whose implications we have debated endlessly, that is definitely
>> not the case here -- a fully-conforming implementation of
>> IDNA2003 is not a fully-conforming implementation of IDNA2008.
>> So, as far as I know, Proposed is the only possibility here.
>>
>>  john
>>
>>
>> --On Thursday, October 01, 2009 07:02 -0400 Vint Cerf
>> <vint at google.com> wrote:
>>
>>> martin,
>>>
>>> that's a good question.
>>>
>>> Lisa,
>>>
>>> while the natural assumption may have been that IDNA2008 was a
>>> direct   modification of IDNA2003, the basis for the design
>>> seems sufficiently   different that it might merit only
>>> proposed standard status. I didn't   catch this when the
>>> announcement was sent.
>>>
>>> Does anyone object to asking for proposed rather than draft
>>> status?
>>>
>>> vint
>>>
>>>
>>> On Oct 1, 2009, at 4:51 AM, Martin J. Dürst wrote:
>>>
>>>> Isn't the Last Call for Draft Standard, and one important
>>>> criterion   for
>>>> Draft Standard is implementations, so the implementation
>>>> report is   relevant?
>>>>
>>>> Regards,   Martin.
>>>>
>>>> On 2009/10/01 5:11, Lisa Dusseault wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Sorry, that was part of the announcement boilerplate that's
>>>>> not relevant to this Last Call -- I didn't notice it to
>>>>> remove it.
>>>>>
>>>>> Lisa
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 1:50 AM, SM<sm at resistor.net>  wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>> At 07:12 29-09-2009, The IESG wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The IESG has received a request from the Internationalized
>>>>>>> Domain   Names
>>>>>>> in Applications, Revised WG (idnabis) to consider the
>>>>>>> following   document:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> - 'Internationalized Domain Names in Applications (IDNA):
>>>>>>> Protocol '
>>>>>>>  <draft-ietf-idnabis-protocol-16.txt>  as a Draft
>>>>>>>  Standard
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [snip]
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Implementation Report can be accessed at
>>>>>>> http://www.ietf.org/iesg/implementation.html
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That's a 404.  Where can I find the implementation report?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>> -sm
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Idna-update mailing list
>>>>>> Idna-update at alvestrand.no
>>>>>> http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/idna-update
>>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Idna-update mailing list
>>>>> Idna-update at alvestrand.no
>>>>> http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/idna-update
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> # -# Martin J. Dürst, Professor, Aoyama Gakuin University
>>>> # -# http://www.sw.it.aoyama.ac.jp
>>>> # mailto:duerst at it.aoyama.ac.jp
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Idna-update mailing list
>>>> Idna-update at alvestrand.no
>>>> http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/idna-update
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Idna-update mailing list
>>> Idna-update at alvestrand.no
>>> http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/idna-update
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>