Apostrophe (was Re: Names)

[Patrik Fältström]

On 24 mar 2009, at 12.51, Kenneth Whistler wrote:

>> Then I must ask myself, why does it have the properties in Unicode it
>> has?
>
> I'm not quite sure whether that was intended as a serious
> question or as rhetorical.

Serious, and I thank you a lot for the explanation!

    Patrik

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PGP.sig
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 186 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://www.alvestrand.no/pipermail/idna-update/attachments/20090325/6b257528/attachment.pgp