Question about the agenda
Vint Cerf
vint at google.com
Sat Mar 21 00:21:58 CET 2009
Paul,
I am not sure I agree at least in the following sense. I think we need
to ask ourselves, based on the goals of the WG and the current
IDNA2008 documents, what our assessment is of its implementation, side-
effects, etc. That is different from coming to conclusions among
alternatives. Perhaps we are simply reflecting a different
interpretation of "conclusions"?
vint
Vint Cerf
Google
1818 Library Street, Suite 400
Reston, VA 20190
202-370-5637
vint at google.com
On Mar 20, 2009, at 6:38 PM, Paul Hoffman wrote:
> Vint recently posted the agenda for next week's meetings to <http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/09mar/agenda/idnabis.html
> >. We cannot "complete discussions, if necessary on IDNA2008
> implications" before the presentation on CJK implications of
> IDNA2008. It would be good to change the schedule so that the
> important considerations brought up by the Asian registries can be
> considered before the implications are considered.
> _______________________________________________
> Idna-update mailing list
> Idna-update at alvestrand.no
> http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/idna-update
More information about the Idna-update
mailing list