Reformatting Tables Section 2.6 for clarity.

Mark Davis ⌛ mark at macchiato.com
Mon Jul 20 21:04:51 CEST 2009


Thanks,

Mark


2009/7/20 Patrik Fältström <patrik at frobbit.se>

> This is now also implemented in the source for the I-D (and RFC).
>    paf
>
> On 16 jul 2009, at 16.06, Mark Davis ⌛ wrote:
>
> This is just for table F, so it is a small range of code points -- the
> exceptions -- where we need to make particularly clear what the status of
> the code points *would have been* had they not been singled out as
> exceptions. You'd agreed to it earlier, and nobody else objected.
>
> PVALID: // would otherwise have been DISALLOWED
>
>    00DF; PVALID     # LATIN SMALL LETTER SHARP S
>    03C2; PVALID     # GREEK SMALL LETTER FINAL SIGMA
>    06FD; PVALID     # ARABIC SIGN SINDHI AMPERSAND
>    06FE; PVALID     # ARABIC SIGN SINDHI POSTPOSITION MEN
>
>    0F0B; PVALID     # TIBETAN MARK INTERSYLLABIC TSHEG
>    3007; PVALID     # IDEOGRAPHIC NUMBER ZERO
>
> CONTEXTO: // would otherwise have been DISALLOWED
>
>    00B7; CONTEXTO   # MIDDLE DOT
>    0375; CONTEXTO   # GREEK LOWER NUMERAL SIGN (KERAIA)
>    05F3; CONTEXTO   # HEBREW PUNCTUATION GERESH
>    05F4; CONTEXTO   # HEBREW PUNCTUATION GERSHAYIM
>    30FB; CONTEXTO   # KATAKANA MIDDLE DOT
>
> CONTEXTO: // would otherwise have been PVALID
>
>    002D; CONTEXTO   # HYPHEN-MINUS
>    02B9; CONTEXTO   # MODIFIER LETTER PRIME
>
>    0660; CONTEXTO   # ARABIC-INDIC DIGIT ZERO
>    0661; CONTEXTO   # ARABIC-INDIC DIGIT ONE
>    0662; CONTEXTO   # ARABIC-INDIC DIGIT TWO
>    0663; CONTEXTO   # ARABIC-INDIC DIGIT THREE
>    0664; CONTEXTO   # ARABIC-INDIC DIGIT FOUR
>
>    0665; CONTEXTO   # ARABIC-INDIC DIGIT FIVE
>    0666; CONTEXTO   # ARABIC-INDIC DIGIT SIX
>    0667; CONTEXTO   # ARABIC-INDIC DIGIT SEVEN
>    0668; CONTEXTO   # ARABIC-INDIC DIGIT EIGHT
>    0669; CONTEXTO   # ARABIC-INDIC DIGIT NINE
>
>    06F0; CONTEXTO   # EXTENDED ARABIC-INDIC DIGIT ZERO
>    06F1; CONTEXTO   # EXTENDED ARABIC-INDIC DIGIT ONE
>    06F2; CONTEXTO   # EXTENDED ARABIC-INDIC DIGIT TWO
>    06F3; CONTEXTO   # EXTENDED ARABIC-INDIC DIGIT THREE
>
>    06F4; CONTEXTO   # EXTENDED ARABIC-INDIC DIGIT FOUR
>    06F5; CONTEXTO   # EXTENDED ARABIC-INDIC DIGIT FIVE
>    06F6; CONTEXTO   # EXTENDED ARABIC-INDIC DIGIT SIX
>    06F7; CONTEXTO   # EXTENDED ARABIC-INDIC DIGIT SEVEN
>
>    06F8; CONTEXTO   # EXTENDED ARABIC-INDIC DIGIT EIGHT
>    06F9; CONTEXTO   # EXTENDED ARABIC-INDIC DIGIT NINE
>    0483; CONTEXTO   # COMBINING CYRILLIC TITLO
>    3005; CONTEXTO   # IDEOGRAPHIC ITERATION MARK
>    303B; CONTEXTO   # VERTICAL IDEOGRAPHIC ITERATION MARK
>
> DISALLOWED: // would otherwise have been PVALID
>
>    302E; DISALLOWED # HANGUL SINGLE DOT TONE MARK
>
>    302F; DISALLOWED # HANGUL DOUBLE DOT TONE MARK
>
>
>
> Mark
>
>
> 2009/7/16 Patrik Fältström <patrik at frobbit.se>
>
>> On 16 jul 2009, at 00.39, Mark Davis ⌛ wrote:
>>
>>  Patrik, this is another one that slipped through the cracks from months
>>> ago.
>>> Can you please change this in Tables?
>>>
>>
>> Let me think about this.
>>
>> I have people that want codepoints in codepoint order, in groups (like you
>> suggest here), and then "compressed" (not one line per codepoint, but
>> instead intervals if the property value is the same for a range of
>> codepoints).
>>
>> I am probably going to let the codepoints continue to be "compressed" in
>> codepoint order, if not more people ask for specific changes.
>>
>>   Patrik
>>
>>
>>> Mark
>>>
>>> (The format below is a bit gummed up by email forwarding: see my original
>>> email for a cleaner version.)
>>>
>>>
>>> 2009/3/23 Mark Davis <mark at macchiato.com>
>>>
>>>  Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> Mark
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 2009/3/23 Patrik Fältström <patrik at frobbit.se>
>>>>
>>>> Sorry, yes, this is ok with me.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>  Patrik
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 23 mar 2009, at 09.57, Mark Davis wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Patrik, I saw no response from you on the following; perhaps you missed
>>>>>
>>>>>> it?
>>>>>> Is it acceptable to you?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Mark
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>>>> From: Mark Davis <mark at macchiato.com>
>>>>>> Date: Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 10:19
>>>>>> Subject: Re: Tatweel
>>>>>> To: Vint Cerf <vint at google.com>, Patrik Fältström <patrik at frobbit.se>
>>>>>> Cc: Alireza Saleh <saleh at nic.ir>, IDNA update work <
>>>>>> idna-update at alvestrand.no>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Patrik,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Tthe listing of characters in
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-idnabis-tables-05#section-2.6could
>>>>>>  be
>>>>>> improved to make it clear what is going on. As it is, it maps
>>>>>> characters
>>>>>> to
>>>>>> PVALID, CONTEXTO, and/or DISALLOWED. It would be handier to have
>>>>>> different
>>>>>> [sub]sections in F. No substantive change, but makes it easier to
>>>>>> understand
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *PVALID: // would otherwise have been DISALLOWED
>>>>>> *
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 00DF; PVALID     # LATIN SMALL LETTER SHARP S
>>>>>> 03C2; PVALID     # GREEK SMALL LETTER FINAL SIGMA
>>>>>> 06FD; PVALID     # ARABIC SIGN SINDHI AMPERSAND
>>>>>> 06FE; PVALID     # ARABIC SIGN SINDHI POSTPOSITION MEN
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 0F0B; PVALID     # TIBETAN MARK INTERSYLLABIC TSHEG
>>>>>> 3007; PVALID     # IDEOGRAPHIC NUMBER ZERO
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *CONTEXTO: // would otherwise have been DISALLOWED
>>>>>> *   00B7; CONTEXTO   # MIDDLE DOT
>>>>>> 0375; CONTEXTO   # GREEK LOWER NUMERAL SIGN (KERAIA)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 05F3; CONTEXTO   # HEBREW PUNCTUATION GERESH
>>>>>> 05F4; CONTEXTO   # HEBREW PUNCTUATION GERSHAYIM
>>>>>> 30FB; CONTEXTO   # KATAKANA MIDDLE DOT
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *CONTEXTO: // would otherwise have been PVALID
>>>>>> *   002D; CONTEXTO   # HYPHEN-MINUS
>>>>>> 02B9; CONTEXTO   # MODIFIER LETTER PRIME
>>>>>> 0660; CONTEXTO   # ARABIC-INDIC DIGIT ZERO
>>>>>> 0661; CONTEXTO   # ARABIC-INDIC DIGIT ONE
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 0662; CONTEXTO   # ARABIC-INDIC DIGIT TWO
>>>>>> 0663; CONTEXTO   # ARABIC-INDIC DIGIT THREE
>>>>>> 0664; CONTEXTO   # ARABIC-INDIC DIGIT FOUR
>>>>>> 0665; CONTEXTO   # ARABIC-INDIC DIGIT FIVE
>>>>>> 0666; CONTEXTO   # ARABIC-INDIC DIGIT SIX
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 0667; CONTEXTO   # ARABIC-INDIC DIGIT SEVEN
>>>>>> 0668; CONTEXTO   # ARABIC-INDIC DIGIT EIGHT
>>>>>> 0669; CONTEXTO   # ARABIC-INDIC DIGIT NINE
>>>>>> 06F0; CONTEXTO   # EXTENDED ARABIC-INDIC DIGIT ZERO
>>>>>> 06F1; CONTEXTO   # EXTENDED ARABIC-INDIC DIGIT ONE
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 06F2; CONTEXTO   # EXTENDED ARABIC-INDIC DIGIT TWO
>>>>>> 06F3; CONTEXTO   # EXTENDED ARABIC-INDIC DIGIT THREE
>>>>>> 06F4; CONTEXTO   # EXTENDED ARABIC-INDIC DIGIT FOUR
>>>>>> 06F5; CONTEXTO   # EXTENDED ARABIC-INDIC DIGIT FIVE
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 06F6; CONTEXTO   # EXTENDED ARABIC-INDIC DIGIT SIX
>>>>>> 06F7; CONTEXTO   # EXTENDED ARABIC-INDIC DIGIT SEVEN
>>>>>> 06F8; CONTEXTO   # EXTENDED ARABIC-INDIC DIGIT EIGHT
>>>>>> 06F9; CONTEXTO   # EXTENDED ARABIC-INDIC DIGIT NINE
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 0483; CONTEXTO   # COMBINING CYRILLIC TITLO
>>>>>> 3005; CONTEXTO   # IDEOGRAPHIC ITERATION MARK
>>>>>> 303B; CONTEXTO   # VERTICAL IDEOGRAPHIC ITERATION MARK
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *DISALLOWED: // would otherwise have been PVALID
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *   302E; DISALLOWED # HANGUL SINGLE DOT TONE MARK
>>>>>> 302F; DISALLOWED # HANGUL DOUBLE DOT TONE MARK
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.alvestrand.no/pipermail/idna-update/attachments/20090720/89cdf757/attachment-0001.htm 


More information about the Idna-update mailing list