Reformatting Tables Section 2.6 for clarity.
Patrik Fältström
patrik at frobbit.se
Mon Jul 20 20:58:38 CEST 2009
This is now also implemented in the source for the I-D (and RFC).
paf
On 16 jul 2009, at 16.06, Mark Davis ⌛ wrote:
> This is just for table F, so it is a small range of code points --
> the exceptions -- where we need to make particularly clear what the
> status of the code points would have been had they not been singled
> out as exceptions. You'd agreed to it earlier, and nobody else
> objected.
>
> PVALID: // would otherwise have been DISALLOWED
> 00DF; PVALID # LATIN SMALL LETTER SHARP S
> 03C2; PVALID # GREEK SMALL LETTER FINAL SIGMA
> 06FD; PVALID # ARABIC SIGN SINDHI AMPERSAND
> 06FE; PVALID # ARABIC SIGN SINDHI POSTPOSITION MEN
>
> 0F0B; PVALID # TIBETAN MARK INTERSYLLABIC TSHEG
> 3007; PVALID # IDEOGRAPHIC NUMBER ZERO
>
> CONTEXTO: // would otherwise have been DISALLOWED
>
>
> 00B7; CONTEXTO # MIDDLE DOT
> 0375; CONTEXTO # GREEK LOWER NUMERAL SIGN (KERAIA)
> 05F3; CONTEXTO # HEBREW PUNCTUATION GERESH
> 05F4; CONTEXTO # HEBREW PUNCTUATION GERSHAYIM
> 30FB; CONTEXTO # KATAKANA MIDDLE DOT
>
>
> CONTEXTO: // would otherwise have been PVALID
>
> 002D; CONTEXTO # HYPHEN-MINUS
> 02B9; CONTEXTO # MODIFIER LETTER PRIME
>
> 0660; CONTEXTO # ARABIC-INDIC DIGIT ZERO
> 0661; CONTEXTO # ARABIC-INDIC DIGIT ONE
> 0662; CONTEXTO # ARABIC-INDIC DIGIT TWO
> 0663; CONTEXTO # ARABIC-INDIC DIGIT THREE
> 0664; CONTEXTO # ARABIC-INDIC DIGIT FOUR
>
> 0665; CONTEXTO # ARABIC-INDIC DIGIT FIVE
> 0666; CONTEXTO # ARABIC-INDIC DIGIT SIX
> 0667; CONTEXTO # ARABIC-INDIC DIGIT SEVEN
> 0668; CONTEXTO # ARABIC-INDIC DIGIT EIGHT
> 0669; CONTEXTO # ARABIC-INDIC DIGIT NINE
>
> 06F0; CONTEXTO # EXTENDED ARABIC-INDIC DIGIT ZERO
> 06F1; CONTEXTO # EXTENDED ARABIC-INDIC DIGIT ONE
> 06F2; CONTEXTO # EXTENDED ARABIC-INDIC DIGIT TWO
> 06F3; CONTEXTO # EXTENDED ARABIC-INDIC DIGIT THREE
>
> 06F4; CONTEXTO # EXTENDED ARABIC-INDIC DIGIT FOUR
> 06F5; CONTEXTO # EXTENDED ARABIC-INDIC DIGIT FIVE
> 06F6; CONTEXTO # EXTENDED ARABIC-INDIC DIGIT SIX
> 06F7; CONTEXTO # EXTENDED ARABIC-INDIC DIGIT SEVEN
>
> 06F8; CONTEXTO # EXTENDED ARABIC-INDIC DIGIT EIGHT
> 06F9; CONTEXTO # EXTENDED ARABIC-INDIC DIGIT NINE
> 0483; CONTEXTO # COMBINING CYRILLIC TITLO
> 3005; CONTEXTO # IDEOGRAPHIC ITERATION MARK
> 303B; CONTEXTO # VERTICAL IDEOGRAPHIC ITERATION MARK
>
>
> DISALLOWED: // would otherwise have been PVALID
>
> 302E; DISALLOWED # HANGUL SINGLE DOT TONE MARK
>
> 302F; DISALLOWED # HANGUL DOUBLE DOT TONE MARK
>
>
> Mark
>
>
> 2009/7/16 Patrik Fältström <patrik at frobbit.se>
> On 16 jul 2009, at 00.39, Mark Davis ⌛ wrote:
>
> Patrik, this is another one that slipped through the cracks from
> months ago.
> Can you please change this in Tables?
>
> Let me think about this.
>
> I have people that want codepoints in codepoint order, in groups
> (like you suggest here), and then "compressed" (not one line per
> codepoint, but instead intervals if the property value is the same
> for a range of codepoints).
>
> I am probably going to let the codepoints continue to be
> "compressed" in codepoint order, if not more people ask for specific
> changes.
>
> Patrik
>
>
> Mark
>
> (The format below is a bit gummed up by email forwarding: see my
> original
> email for a cleaner version.)
>
>
> 2009/3/23 Mark Davis <mark at macchiato.com>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Mark
>
>
> 2009/3/23 Patrik Fältström <patrik at frobbit.se>
>
> Sorry, yes, this is ok with me.
>
> Patrik
>
>
> On 23 mar 2009, at 09.57, Mark Davis wrote:
>
> Patrik, I saw no response from you on the following; perhaps you
> missed
> it?
> Is it acceptable to you?
>
> Mark
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Mark Davis <mark at macchiato.com>
> Date: Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 10:19
> Subject: Re: Tatweel
> To: Vint Cerf <vint at google.com>, Patrik Fältström
> <patrik at frobbit.se>
> Cc: Alireza Saleh <saleh at nic.ir>, IDNA update work <
> idna-update at alvestrand.no>
>
>
> ...
>
> Patrik,
>
> Tthe listing of characters in
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-idnabis-tables-05#section-2.6could
> be
>
> improved to make it clear what is going on. As it is, it maps
> characters
> to
> PVALID, CONTEXTO, and/or DISALLOWED. It would be handier to have
> different
> [sub]sections in F. No substantive change, but makes it easier to
> understand
>
> *PVALID: // would otherwise have been DISALLOWED
> *
>
> 00DF; PVALID # LATIN SMALL LETTER SHARP S
> 03C2; PVALID # GREEK SMALL LETTER FINAL SIGMA
> 06FD; PVALID # ARABIC SIGN SINDHI AMPERSAND
> 06FE; PVALID # ARABIC SIGN SINDHI POSTPOSITION MEN
>
> 0F0B; PVALID # TIBETAN MARK INTERSYLLABIC TSHEG
> 3007; PVALID # IDEOGRAPHIC NUMBER ZERO
>
> *CONTEXTO: // would otherwise have been DISALLOWED
> * 00B7; CONTEXTO # MIDDLE DOT
> 0375; CONTEXTO # GREEK LOWER NUMERAL SIGN (KERAIA)
>
> 05F3; CONTEXTO # HEBREW PUNCTUATION GERESH
> 05F4; CONTEXTO # HEBREW PUNCTUATION GERSHAYIM
> 30FB; CONTEXTO # KATAKANA MIDDLE DOT
>
> *CONTEXTO: // would otherwise have been PVALID
> * 002D; CONTEXTO # HYPHEN-MINUS
> 02B9; CONTEXTO # MODIFIER LETTER PRIME
> 0660; CONTEXTO # ARABIC-INDIC DIGIT ZERO
> 0661; CONTEXTO # ARABIC-INDIC DIGIT ONE
>
> 0662; CONTEXTO # ARABIC-INDIC DIGIT TWO
> 0663; CONTEXTO # ARABIC-INDIC DIGIT THREE
> 0664; CONTEXTO # ARABIC-INDIC DIGIT FOUR
> 0665; CONTEXTO # ARABIC-INDIC DIGIT FIVE
> 0666; CONTEXTO # ARABIC-INDIC DIGIT SIX
>
> 0667; CONTEXTO # ARABIC-INDIC DIGIT SEVEN
> 0668; CONTEXTO # ARABIC-INDIC DIGIT EIGHT
> 0669; CONTEXTO # ARABIC-INDIC DIGIT NINE
> 06F0; CONTEXTO # EXTENDED ARABIC-INDIC DIGIT ZERO
> 06F1; CONTEXTO # EXTENDED ARABIC-INDIC DIGIT ONE
>
> 06F2; CONTEXTO # EXTENDED ARABIC-INDIC DIGIT TWO
> 06F3; CONTEXTO # EXTENDED ARABIC-INDIC DIGIT THREE
> 06F4; CONTEXTO # EXTENDED ARABIC-INDIC DIGIT FOUR
> 06F5; CONTEXTO # EXTENDED ARABIC-INDIC DIGIT FIVE
>
> 06F6; CONTEXTO # EXTENDED ARABIC-INDIC DIGIT SIX
> 06F7; CONTEXTO # EXTENDED ARABIC-INDIC DIGIT SEVEN
> 06F8; CONTEXTO # EXTENDED ARABIC-INDIC DIGIT EIGHT
> 06F9; CONTEXTO # EXTENDED ARABIC-INDIC DIGIT NINE
>
> 0483; CONTEXTO # COMBINING CYRILLIC TITLO
> 3005; CONTEXTO # IDEOGRAPHIC ITERATION MARK
> 303B; CONTEXTO # VERTICAL IDEOGRAPHIC ITERATION MARK
>
> *DISALLOWED: // would otherwise have been PVALID
>
> * 302E; DISALLOWED # HANGUL SINGLE DOT TONE MARK
> 302F; DISALLOWED # HANGUL DOUBLE DOT TONE MARK
>
>
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.alvestrand.no/pipermail/idna-update/attachments/20090720/23118f58/attachment.htm
More information about the Idna-update
mailing list